First of all, in my drafts, the teams breakdown like this: 8 forwards, 4 defense and 2 goalies per team. In the past three seasons, I have had 17 teams each year participating, which is kind of a fluke, but still interesting. I'm definitely hoping for more teams in 2011, which should increase the competitive level and decrease the overall points, but I think the forwards, defense and goalie rankings should still be comparable.
2008 | Points | Forwards | Defense | Goalies |
1st Place (Stuart) | 820 | 3rd | 4th | 3rd |
2nd Place (Clayton) | 817 | 1st | 12th | 13th |
3rd Place (Chris) | 780 | 5th | 2nd | 7th |
----- | ||||
2009 | Points | Forwards | Defense | Goalies |
1st Place (Clayton) | 787 | 1st | 16th | 4th |
2nd Place (John B.) | 769 | 5th | 6th | 9th |
3rd Place (Peter) | 769 | 7th | 7th | 3rd |
----- | ||||
2010 | Points | Forwards | Defense | Goalies |
1st Place (Leon) | 779 | 5th | 4th | 3rd |
2nd Place (Wayne) | 773 | 1st | 8th | 6th |
3rd Place (Dale B.) | 763 | 9th | 10th | 2nd |
Consistently, we see the team with the most points from their forwards in the top three and with more forwards, should come a lot more points. The highest ranking between defense and goalies is only 2nd, which happened once each, defense in 2008 and goalies in 2010.
In the past two seasons, I've had the same guy win the defenseman race, both years he had a fair margin on 2nd place in the category. In 2009, he finished 14th and in 2010, he finished 4th. He was way off one year and actually in much better shape last season, obviously learning from his prior mistakes.
In terms of teams leading the pool in goalie points, in 2008 it was a 7th place finish; in 2009, it was a 10th place finish; and in 2010, it was a 10th place finish again. Getting the best tandem in net doesn't seem to be a great way to go, despite getting a good number of points between only two players. The goalies are almost a garnish to a good team, but if they are taken too high in this draft, you might be giving up on some more consistent scoring in the early rounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment